|
TECHNOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENTS: ROBOTIC SYSTEM AND BARIATRIC
SURGERY: IS IT WORTH IT? Robotic is a recent advance in surgery,
particularly in video-assisted mini-invasive surgical procedures requiring
manual sutures. Indeed using stitches and manipulating sewing intruments can be
greatly facilitated by a robotic system. One of the first promising fields has
been heart surgery (coronary bypass). Different procedures have been attempted
in laparoscopic abdominal surgery with a robotic system, and recently
gastro-jejunal bypass
. The principle is simple and attractive: an assistant prepares
the instruments, inserts trocars inside the abdomen, as well as an optical
device connected to a vidéo system; he will stay close to the patient during
the procedure for safety reasons and will change the instruments.The surgeon
seats outside the operating room, and manipulates from there specific
instruments for dissection, suturing, etc., thanks to a remote control station.
This station has a monitor for tri-dimensional vision and a tactile device for
remote control of the robot arms. The central part of the robot reproduces
accurately the surgeon's moves, which make it possible to use reliable suturing
devices (commonly used during gastric bypass). Several centers have tried it
successfully. An Italian team lead by du Pr Parini (Val d'Aoste) has reported its
preliminary experience of 11 patients operated on with the Da Vinci robot. This
device was available in his hospital for 2003 and has been used in 70 various
interventions*. Mean duration of operation has been 201 minutes (125 to 250).
No complication has been reported. It is premature to draw any conclusion, and
a cost-efficiency analysis has not been established so far. It is supposed that
the sewing will be hand made, whereas many surgeons use stapling devices. In other
bariatric procedures, such as lap-banding, the interest of the robotic system
is at least questionnable.
* Robot-assisted
gastric bypass with Da Vinci system. Preliminary experience. U Parini et col. Journal of
coelio-surgery, 2004, 50: 64-70.
|